Experiential congruency
The brand new experientially congruent construal of a figure, or an excellent quantum off changes, are a condition simplex, such as she did not understand the regulations. If we need to congruently expand about figure that have other quantum out of changes, we’re going to atart exercising . another condition simplex. For example, she didn’t be aware of the rules, so she passed away, otherwise she passed away just like the she failed to understand legislation. In this situation, you will find a sequence from one or two quanta of transform realised congruently in the form of a clause advanced, in which the supplementary term rationally enhances the no. 1 clause. And additionally these types of congruent realisations in the form of logical improvement, we could also encode an identical sequence when it comes to a natural series which have a conjunctive, elizabeth.g. she failed to understand statutes. For that reason, she died; or instead a connective, e.grams. she passed away. She did not understand guidelines. Given that each condition on advice inside paragraph encodes an excellent profile, we say that all of them are experientially congruent realisations of logico-semantic relatives from end up in.
Thus, at condition height, this new congruent realisation of your own semantic sounding shape ’s the term, and that of your semantic group of sequence ’s the term cutting-edge and/or natural series. We can and additionally discuss about it experiential congruency whenever explaining the sun and rain from inside the term transitivity. In she failed to understand regulations, thus she died, the two Players in the primary term is congruently realised by the affordable teams (she, the guidelines), therefore the Process is congruently realized from the a spoken classification (did not understand). Hence, an important clause as a whole is actually realized congruently because it was a construal of 1 profile. An identical applies to the new secondary clause (she passed away). The two conditions along with her generate a series, that’s congruently realised from the a condition cutting-edge.
That’s, a condition simplex construing a reason–impression dating which is marked of the Procedure or a participant is actually reduced direct than just a term state-of-the-art or a natural succession you to encodes a comparable end in–impact relationships
But not, just one condition can often condense a couple of quanta out-of alter (i.e. incidents otherwise goings-on). Whenever one of several two rates, and this is short for the source or the impact, are realised by an excellent prepositional terms providing just like the a circumstance from inside the the term configuration, the new term no longer is thought to be a congruent experiential realisation. Quite simply, this new semantic groups commonly realized having fun with congruent lexicogrammatical tips. Inside SFL, an effective prepositional words working due to the fact a circumstance from inside the a condition simplex is known as a minor Processes. Based on Halliday and you can Matthiessen (1999, 329), the fresh “prepositional terminology is interpreted just like the a shrunken furfling konum deÄŸiÅŸtirme clause, the spot where the preposition functions as an effective ‘lesser Process’, interpreted while the a variety of mini-verb, plus the affordable group given that a person contained in this lesser Techniques”, age.grams. “brand new decelerate was due to [we.age. caused by] a hit”. The next examples instruct this subsequent.
In the 1st ones examples, a couple data is compressed for the a term simplex (passing away and being unaware). Next analogy expresses an identical numbers during the a clause cutting-edge, i.age. a sequence rather than just one contour. Thanks to this realisational incongruency of the term simplex in the basic example, we are able to point out that it’s smaller specific versus clause complex example. Because of the exact same token, we are able to claim that the new clause simplex is additionally reduced specific than a natural sequence that have a good conmatical realisation of semantics of one’s end up in–feeling relationships (e.grams. She don’t know the guidelines. Therefore, she died).
The other a couple experiential realisations out-of end in, as a participant and/or Process itself, is thought to be instances of squeezed pointers, once more as the a couple rates is encoded in one term. Think the lady lack of knowledge of the regulations triggered her death, or even the cause for this lady passing was this lady ignorance of regulations. Considering this experiential incongruency, we.e. this new realisation of your own semantic group of sequence in the shape of a term simplex, we are able to achieve the exact same achievement regarding your quantity of explicitness.